Highlights:► potential possibilities of fluctuating employment are: declining living standards of the employed population, unemployment, inefficient fulfillment of labor functions, development of shadow economy
► one of the compulsory conditions for formation of a flexible labor market is the creation of qualitative institutes of social support of the unemployed in order to establish balance between the employment guaranties and market flexibility – the situation called ‘flexicurity’ in the English-speaking countries (‘flexibility’ + ‘security’)
► governments of certain countries develop mechanisms to protect employees from fluctuating employment; one of such mechanisms is institutionalization of the social support of the employees who work on an irregular basis (casual employment)
► disadvantages related to the professional education of labor market participants are a considerable factor decreasing the stability of employment and having a negative effect on labor market functioning
Abstract:The article provides an overview of the manifestations of fluctuating employment in the world’s countries. The author substantiates the relevance of the article and, in this connection, the reference to the world experience. Based on foreign and domestic scientific-practical literature, the author analyzes the category of fluctuating employment and individual forms of its manifestation – the phenomena of freeters and NEET’s. The authors discuss the peculiarities of employment, labor motivation and professional education of the unsteadily employed persons and set a question whether or not such persons should be considered as market participants. Finally, the conclusion on the relationship between fluctuating employment and professional education is made.
The article was prepared for publishing with the aid of grant No. 16-02-00290 from Russian Foundation for Humanities. Project title: Fluctuating employment in Russia: possibilities and difficulties of increasing the labor potential efficiency.
Keywords:employment, fluctuating employment, freeters, labor market, NEET’s, precariat, professional education
JEL-Classification: J21, J24, J30, O57
References (transliterated):1. Voroshilov N.V. Effektivnosty munitsipalnogo upravleniya: suschnosty i podkhody k otsenke // Problemy razvitiya territoriy. – 2015. – № 3. – S. 143–159.
2. Panov A.M. Professionalnoe obrazovanie uchastnikov rynka truda Vologodskoy oblasti: strukturnyy analiz // Alma Mater: Vestnik Vysshey shkoly. – 2015. – № 10. – S. 34–38.
3. Uskova T.V., Povarova A.I. Problemy effektivnosti gosudarstvennogo upravleniya // Sbornik nauchnyh dokladov i soobscheniy Uchenogo soveta ISERT RAN. Vyp. 9. – Vologda: ISERT RAN, 2014. – S. 4–58.
4. Shkaratan O.I., Karacharovskiy V.V., Gasyukova E.N. Prekariat: teoriya i empiricheskiy analiz (na materialakh oprosov v Rossii, 1994–2013) // SOTsIS. – 2015. – № 12. – S. 99–110.
5. Abrams F. Learning to Fail: How Society Lets Young People Down. – Taylor and Francis, 2009. – 172 p.
6. Attewell P., Newman K. S. Growing Gaps: Educational Inequality around the World. – Oxford University Press, 2010. – 360 p.
7. Bridging the gap: new opportunities for 16–18 year olds not in education, employment or training. – London: United Kingdom Cabinet Office, 2009.
8. Casual Employees [Electronic resource] // Lawhandbook.sa.gov.au. – Mode of access: http://www.lawhandbook.sa.gov.au/ch18s02s05.php
9. Global Action against Precarious Work // Metal World. – 2007. – № 1. – P. 18–21.
10. Honda Y. ‘Freeters’: young atypical workers in Japan [Electronic resource] // Web.jil.go.jp. – Mode of access: http://web.jil.go.jp/english/JLR/documents/2005/JLR07_honda.pdf
11. Katsumata Y. M. Japanese social security measures to support the retiring aged: From employment insurance and public pension. – Helsinki: ISSA, 2000. – 23 p.
12. Work, Education and Employability. – Bern, 2008. – 191 p.
13. Increasing Participation: Understanding Young People who do not Participate in Education or Training at 16 and 17 / T. Spielhofer [et al.]. – Nottingham: Department for Children, Schools and Families, 2009. – 120 p.
14. Guy Standing (2009) Work after Globalization. Building Occupational Citizenship. Cheltenham, UK, and Northampton, MA, USA. Edgar Elgar. 366 pp. & Guy Standing (2011) The Precariat. The New Dangerous Class. New York and London. Bloomsbury Academic, 198 pp. // Nordic Journal of Working Life Studies. – 2014. – Vol. 4. – № I. – P. 75–80.
15. Tangian A. S. Is flexible work precarious? A study based on the 4th European survey of working conditions 2005: WSI-Diskussionspapier № 153. – 2004. – 77 p.
16. Sayt The World Bank (http://data.worldbank.org/).
17. What does NEETs mean and why is the concept so easily misinterpreted?: Technical Brief № 1 [Electronic resource] // ILO.org. – 2015. – Mode of access: http://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---dgreports/---dcomm/documents/publication/wcms_343153.pdf