Published in «Russian Journal of Innovation Economics»3 / 2018
DOI: 10.18334/vinec.8.3.39384

Economic evaluation of the optimum performance of an innovative enterprise with the account of the cyclicity of its development

Beilin Igor Leonidovich, Kazan Federal University, Russia

Khomenko Vadim Vasilevich, Tatarstan Academy of Sciences, Russia

Экономическая оценка оптимальной производительности инновационного предприятия с учетом цикличности его развития - View in Russian

 Download PDF | Downoads: 56

Highlights:
The article considers the expediency of applying the method of collapsibility criteria for estimating the optimal productivity of an innovative enterprise, taking into account the cyclical nature of its development.
Based on the ranking of the demand for an innovative product, the possibility of adjusting the economic efficiency of the enterprise is shown.
An adequate comparison of equally important and weighted alternatives to production opportunities can be a tool for managing the sustainability of an innovative enterprise.

Abstract:
The article examines the economic problems of innovative enterprises, taking into account the cyclical nature of their development, which are characterized by models of increasing profits with the least losses. As the main method, additive convolution is used with equally important and weighted demand for an innovative product. The estimation of the economically optimal volume of products is presented. The research is complex and can have an impact on social, environmental and other performance indicators of the production sector of the economy.

Keywords:

additive convolution, cyclical development, economic uncertainty, innovative enterprise, optimal performance

JEL-Classification: O32, O33, С45

Citation:
Beilin I.L., Khomenko V.V. (2018). Economic evaluation of the optimum performance of an innovative enterprise with the account of the cyclicity of its development [Ekonomicheskaya otsenka optimalnoy proizvoditelnosti innovatsionnogo predpriyatiya s uchetom tsiklichnosti ego razvitiya]. Russian Journal of Innovation Economics, 8(3). (in Russian). – doi: 10.18334/vinec.8.3.39384.


References (transliterated):
Aleksakhina M.K. (2008). Razvitie innovatsionnoy deyatelnosti v upravlenii predpriyatiem [Development of innovative activity in enterprise management]. The problems of Economy. (6). 27-30. (in Russian).
Anisimova I.A., Bogatko A.M. (2009). Innovatsionnye podkhody k upravleniyu rossiyskimi predpriyatiyami [Innovative approaches to management in Russian enterprises]. Management of innovations. (2). 80-84. (in Russian).
Beilin I.L. (2006). Prikladnye svoystva novyh sopolimerov tsiklicheskikh karbonatov s izotsianatami razlichnogo stroeniya [Applied properties of new copolymers of cyclic carbonates with isocyanates of different structure]. Plasticheskiye massy (Plastic masses). (4). 19-22. (in Russian).
Beilin I.L. (2012). Otsenka konkurentosposobnosti malogo innovatsionnogo predpriyatiya po FZ 217 [Evaluation of the competitiveness of small innovative enterprises with the Federal law 217]. Bulletin of Kazan National Research Technological University. 15 (21). 173-174. (in Russian).
Beilin I.L., Arkhireev V.P. (2009). New copolymer products from cyclic carbonates and isocyanate-containing compounds Protection of Metals and Physical Chemistry of Surfaces. 45 (4). 450-454.
Beilin I.L., Arkhireev V.P. (2011). Synthesis and structure of copoly(amide esters) based on cyclic carbonates and monofunctional isocyanates Protection of Metals and Physical Chemistry of Surfaces. 47 (4). 478-483.
Beilin I.L., Arkhireev V.P., Galibeev S.S. (2004). Izuchenie anionooy sopolimerizatsii propilenkarbonata s izotsianatami [The study anyoneas copolymerization of isocyanates with propylenecarbonate]. Bulletin of Kazan National Research Technological University. (1). 369-374. (in Russian).
Beilin I.L., Arkhireev V.P., Galibeev S.S., Azimov Yu.I (2006). Novye poliamidoefiry na osnove propilenkarbonata [New propilencarbonate-based polyamidethers]. Chemistry and chemical technology. 49 (1). 108-112. (in Russian).
Beilin I.L., Arkhireev V.P., Nefedova M.A. (2006). Sintez i struktura novyh sopolimerov tsiklicheskikh karbonatov s monoizotsianatami [Synthesis and structure of new copolymers of cyclic carbonates with monoisocyanates]. Plasticheskiye massy (Plastic masses). (1). 23-27. (in Russian).
Beilin I.L., Nefedova M.A., Arkhireev V.P. (2006). Anionnaya sopolimerizatsiya tsiklicheskikh karbonatov s monoizotsianitami [Anionic copolymerization of cyclic carbonates with monoisocyanates]. Bulletin of Kazan National Research Technological University. (1). 163-169. (in Russian).
Korol T. (2011). Multi-Criteria Early Warning System Against Enterprise Bankruptcy Risk International Research Journal of Finance and Economics. (61). 141-154.
Kumar P., Ravi V. (2007). Bankruptcy prediction in banks and firms via statistical and intelligent techniques – a review European Journal of Operational Research. (180). 1-28.
Matveykin V.G., Yavnik R.M., Romanov A.D. (2003). Informatsionnye sistemy v planirovanii i upravlenii innovatsionnym predpriyatiem: postroenie modeley i poisk optimalnogo upravleniya [Information Systems in Planning and Management of Innovative Enterprise: Models Creating and Search for Optimum Control]. Vestnik Tambovskogo gosudarstvennogo tekhnicheskogo universiteta. 9 (4). 638-645. (in Russian).
Mcleay S., Omar A. (2000). The sensitivity of prediction models to the non-normality of bounded and unbounded financial ratios British Accounting Review. (32). 213-230.
Minyuk S.A., Rovba E.A., Kuzmich K.K. (2002). Matematicheskie metody i modeli v ekonomike [Mathematical methods and models in economics] M.: TetraSistems. (in Russian).
Nwogugu M. (2007). Decision-making, risk and corporate governance – a critique of methodological issues in bankruptcy/recovery prediction models Applied Mathematics and Computation. (185). 178-196.
Ooghe H., Balcaen S. (2006). 35 years of studies on business failure – an overview of the classic statistical methodologies and their related problems British Accounting Review. (38). 63-93.
Plokhotnikov K.E. (2009). Vychislitelnye metody. Teoriya i praktika v srede MATLAB [Computational method. Theory and practice in MATLAB] M.: Goryachaya Liniya – Telekom. (in Russian).
Podinovskiy V.V. (2007). Vvedenie v teoriyu vazhnosti kriteriev v mnogokriterialnyh zadachakh prinyatiya resheniy [Introduction to the theory of the importance of criteria in multicriteria decision-making problems] M.: Fizmatlit. (in Russian).
Popov A.L. (2008). Sistemy podderzhki prinyatiya resheniy [Decision making support systems] Yekaterinburg: Ural. gos. un-t. (in Russian).
Shkuratov S.E. (2006). Podkhod k strategicheskomu upravleniyu malym innovatsionnym predpriyatiem [Approach to strategic management of a small innovative enterprise]. Control Sciences (Problemy Upravleniya). (6). 88-90. (in Russian).
Thomas L. (2000). Survey of credit and behavioural scoring – forecasting financial risk of lending to consumers International Journal of Forecasting. (16). 149-172.