Published in «Journal of International Economic Affairs»1 / 2019
DOI: 10.18334/eo.9.1.39913

Signs of destructive entrepreneurship in russia (on the example of cargo vehicle transport)

Loginova Natalya Anatolevna, Saint Petersburg branch of Russian customs academy named after V.B.Bobkov, Russia

Признаки деструктивного предпринимательства в России (на примере грузового автомобильного транспорта) - View in Russian

 Download PDF | Downoads: 54

In Russia, approximately to date, more than half (51%) of carriers belong to small businesses. In the domestic road transport industry in the freight seg-ment: a vacuum of effective rules of the game, which must be established by the state, led to the formation of destructive entrepreneurship and a sharp increase in the number of illegitimate carriers. With the introduction of the exemption of economic entities owning freight rolling stock from licensing, the sphere of de-structive business in transport has expanded significantly. The benefit for carriers as a result of destructive behavior in the trucking business is enormous and ex-ceeds the state’s damage by 2.4 billion rubles. (or 5.4%). Without stopping such activities, the state not only incurs losses, but also indirectly “stimulates” de-structive entrepreneurship in automobile transport to even greater benefits

The article shows the systematic nature of destructive entrepreneurship in freight road transport, through the aggregation of statistical data. The article also highlighted, described and ranked the signs of destructive entrepreneur-ship inherent in the domestic freight road transport. The basis of the study is an anonymous interviewing by the author of entrepreneurs engaged in the car-riage of goods by road during 2012–2018. The results obtained allowed to as-sess the damage caused annually to the state, as well as the outputs of econom-ic entities.


benefit, damage, destructive entrepreneurship, violation

JEL-Classification: D22, D23, D91, R43

Loginova N.A. (2019). Signs of destructive entrepreneurship in russia (on the example of cargo vehicle transport) [Priznaki destruktivnogo predprinimatelstva v Rossii (na primere gruzovogo avtomobilnogo transporta)]. Journal of International Economic Affairs, 9(1). (in Russian). – doi: 10.18334/eo.9.1.39913.

References (transliterated):
Borovkov A.A. (2016). Subekt moshennichestva v sfere predprinimatelskoy deyatelnosti [Subject of fraud which is committed in the sphere of the business activity]. Chernye dyry v Rossiyskom zakonodatelstve. (3). 56-60. (in Russian).
Chumakov A.V. (2017). Tipovye mekhanizmy organizovannoy prestupnoy deyatelnosti, svyazannoy s moshennichestvom pri poluchenii vyplat [Standard mechanisms of the organized criminal activity connected with fraud when receiving payments]. Chernye dyry v Rossiyskom zakonodatelstve. (6). 214-219. (in Russian).
Grabovskiy V.D., Lubin A.F. (2012). Kriminalistika: Rassledovanie prestupleniy v sfere ekonomiki [Forensics: the investigation of crimes in economy sphere] M.: Prospekt. (in Russian).
Kochetkov A.M., Senchev I.N. (2017). Osobennosti ispolzovaniya spetsialnyh znaniy v sfere ekonomiki pri rassledovanii moshennichestva, sovershaemogo v otnoshenii gosudarstvennogo imuschestva [Specific aspects of using of special economic knowledge during an investigation of frauds against state property]. Chernye dyry v Rossiyskom zakonodatelstve. (3). 133-136. (in Russian).
Kosyh S., Maksimov S. (1990). Moshennichestvo na transporte [Fraud in transport]. Sov. yustitsiya. (21). 19. (in Russian).
Kovbenko N.D. (2008). Sostoyanie i struktura moshennichestva v Rossii [State and structure of the fraud in Russia]. Rossiyskaya yustitsiya. (7). 20-23. (in Russian).
Loginova N.A. (2010). Problemy razvitiya transportnogo kompleksa Rossii v usloviyakh rynochnyh otnosheniy [Problems of the transport complex of russia in the market economy]. Bulletin of Saint-Petersburg State University of Economics. Series: The Economy. (3(38)). 156-162. (in Russian).
Loginova N.A. (2017). Determinanty destruktivnogo biznes-povedeniya na transporte [Determinants destructive to business conduct transport]. Siberian Journal of Economics and Management. 6 (1). 103-117. (in Russian).
Loginova N.A. (2018). Sravnitelnyy analiz subektov destruktivnogo predprinimatelstva na gruzovom avtomobilnom transporte v Rossii i za rubezhom [Comparative analysis of subjects destructive entrepreneurship on traffic in transport in russia and the foreign country]. Siberian Journal of Economics and Management. 7 (1-2). 72-80. (in Russian).
Loginova N.A., Prvanov Kh.P. (2013). Organizatsiya predprinimatelskoy deyatelnosti na transporte [Entrepreneurship in transport] M.: INFRA-M. (in Russian).
Novikov V.V. (2011). Obektivnaya kharakteristika moshennichestva [Objective characteristics of fraud]. Criminal law (ugolovnoye pravo). (4). 27-31. (in Russian).
Rakhymova M. (2014). Instituty i predprinimatelstvo [Institutions and entrepreneurship] Problems and prospects of economics and management. 35-37. (in Russian).
Sigov V.I., Smirnov A.A. (1999). Tenevaya ekonomika: genezis, sovremennye tendentsii, strategiya vytesneniya iz natsionalnogo khozyaystva Rossii [The shadow economy: genesis, current trends, the strategy of pushing the national economy of Russia] SPb.: Izd-vo SPbGUEF. (in Russian).
Suyts V., Voloshin D. (2013). Konsolidirovannaya finansovaya otchetnost: kosvennye priznaki moshennichestva [Consolidated Financial Reporting: Indirect Indicia of Fraud]. Problemy teorii i praktiki upravleniya. (8). 92-99. (in Russian).
Vechkanov G.S. (2005). Ekonomicheskaya bezopasnost [Economic security] SPb.. (in Russian).
Volzhenkin B.V. (2002). Prestupleniya v sfere ekonomicheskoy deyatelnosti (ekonomicheskie prestupleniya) [Crimes in the sphere of economic activities (economic crimes)] SPb.: Izd-vo «Yuridicheskiy tsentr Press». (in Russian).
Zharikov E. (2000). Moshennichestvo v biznese [Fraud in business]. Staff management. (3). 38-41. (in Russian).