Download PDF | Downoads: 49
Highlights:• Modern Russian organizations are increasingly trying to compete with foreign firms in foreign markets, to meet international requirements.
• A significant barrier to the development of modern organizations is ineffective archaic management, which relies on Soviet ideas of motivation, control and organization.
• Ineffective, based on authoritarian style and low wages, management leads to restrictionism.
• Restrictionism is a hidden form of protest by an employee (along with increased staff turnover) against under-salaries, excessive control and poor management.
• Restrictionism is a phenomenon that today is massively observed in Russian organizations, the reason for which is extremely low salaries and excessive, tight control with subsequent (not always justified) sanctions.
• Among the measures that help to effectively deal with restrictionism, one can single out a balanced and socially oriented motivational mechanism, as well as the granting of freedom in the performance of the tasks with accompanying soft control.
Abstract:The article deals with the phenomenon of «working with coolness» (restrictionism), which often appears in companies with low wages and weak management. This phenomenon was discovered by the founder of scientific management Frederick Winslow Taylor, watching the actions of workers in Philadelphia. At the moment, not enough attention is paid to the heads of organizations to restriction in our country. Restrictionism prevents the development of Russian companies, does not allow them to realize all their opportunities. Analysis of the causes of restrictionism, as well as the search for effective measures to overcome this phenomenon, is an urgent task for Russian management. In developing such measures it is necessary to use the successful experience of successful companies. As such measures, the article proposes using a set of motivational and stimulating influences, as well as stimulating the creative potential of an employee, accompanied by soft control.
Keywords:management, motivation, organization, restrictionism, transparency
JEL-Classification: J01, M12, M14, M16, O33
References (transliterated):Adizes I. (2014). Upravlyaya izmeneniyami. Kak effektivno upravlyat izmeneniyami v obschestve, biznese i lichnoy zhizni [Driving changes. How to effectively manage change in society, business and personal life] M.: Mann, Ivanov i Farber. (in Russian).
Bikmetov R.Sh. (2016). Formirovanie edkhokraticheskoy struktury otechestvennyh organizatsiy v usloviyakh razvitiya innovatsiy [Edhocratic structure’s formation of domestic organizations in the conditions of innovations’ development]. Discussion. (5(68)). 49-54. (in Russian).
Bikmetov R.Sh. (2016). Strategiya sotsialno-ekonomicheskogo razvitiya gradoobrazuyuschikh predpriyatiy v usloviyakh sanktsiy [Strategy for socio-economic development of the city-forming enterprises in conditions of sanctions]. Ekonomika i upravlenie: nauchno-prakticheskiy zhurnal. (1(129)). 17-21. (in Russian).
Dudnik K.S., Ilyukhina L.A. (2015). Analiz motivatsii i stimulirovaniya personala na primere kompaniy «Google» i «Yandeks» [Analysis of motivation and stimulation of personnel on the example of the companies "Google" and "Yandex"]. Eurasian Union of Scientists. (2-1(11)). 65-67. (in Russian).
Ford G. (1989). Moya zhizn. Moi dostizheniya [My life. My achievements] M.: Finansy i statistika. (in Russian).
Kravchenko A.I. (2016). Pochemu nemets rabotaet luchshe russkogo? [Why Germans Work Better than a Russian?]. Eco. (8(506)). 179-189. (in Russian).
Radaev V.V. (2005). Ekonomicheskaya sotsiologiya [Economic sociology] M.: Izdatelskiy dom GU VShE. (in Russian).
Rusheva A.V. (2014). Problema restriktsionizma v realizatsii upravlencheskikh innovatsiy [The problem of restrictionism in the implementation of management innovations] Social innovation in the development of labour relations and employment in the XXI century. 490-493. (in Russian).
Solovev A.V. (2017). Usloviya dlya rosta proizvoditelnosti truda kak obekt upravleniya personalom [Conditions for the growth of labor productivity as an object of personnel management]. Hr. (5-6). 100-104. (in Russian).
Tarasova N.N. (1993). Ot prikaza k motivatsii: novye printsipy upravleniya v SShA [From the order to motivation: new principles of governance in the United States]. "Polis. Political Studies" Journal. (2). 179-184. (in Russian).
Teylor F.U. (1991). Printsipy nauchnogo menedzhmenta [The principles of scientific management] M.: Kontrolling. (in Russian).
Uaytli F. (2003). Motivatsiya [Motivation] M.: Izdatelskiy dom «Vilyams». (in Russian).
Yakokka Li (2017). Karera menedzhera [ Manager career] M.: Izdatelstvo «Popurri». (in Russian).
Kudrin A.L. Proizvoditelnosty truda v Rossii nakhoditsya na urovne stran G7 80-kh godovTass. (in Russian). Retrieved from https://tass.ru/nacionalnye-proekty/6171258
Nevinnaya I. Chas ot chasu ne legche. Pochemu v Rossii ne vvodyat pochasovuyu oplatu trudaRossiyskaya gazeta. (in Russian). Retrieved from https://rg.ru/2014/01/21/rabota.html