Download PDF | Downoads: 18
Abstract:The article deals with the problems of why in the period of various (neo)liberal transformations, and in particular of the 54 macrotechnologies that determined the world's scientific and technological progress, every third was Soviet. However, at present, the Russian leadership is partially preserved only in aerospace, nuclear power, energy engineering and special metallurgy.
Keywords:agribusiness, agricultural production, agro-industrial complex, financing, industry, material and technical basis, production, scientific and technical progress, transformation
References (transliterated):Koptev Yu.N., Kutakhov V.P., Rusinov A.A. (2016). Tekhnologiya realizatsii gosudarstvennoy politiki Rossii po ukrepleniyu oboronosposobnosti, suvereniteta i tekhnologicheskomu razvitiyu promyshlennosti [The technology of Russia’s state policy implementation as for the defense potential and sovereignty strengthening, and for the industry technological development]. Russian Journal of Entrepreneurship. 16 (21). 3649-3658. (in Russian). doi: 10.18334/rp.16.21.2016.
Lavrichenko O.V. (2014). Sistemnyy podkhod k razrabotke nauchnoy kontseptsii innovatsionnyh biznesobrazuyuschikh tekhnologiy [Systematic approach to development of the scientific concept of innovative business-forming technologies]. Creative economy. (10(94)). 32-41. (in Russian).
Sherin V.A., Zhigalova O.V. (2015). Metodicheskoe obespechenie otsenki effektivnosti byudzhetnyh investitsiy v sozdanie vysokotekhnologichnogo tsentra [Methodological support for assessment of the efficiency of public investments in the establishment of a high-tech center]. Russian Journal of Innovation Economics. 5 (1). 27-36. (in Russian). doi: 10.18334/inec.