Published in «Russian Journal of Innovation Economics»2 / 2019
DOI: 10.18334/vinec.9.2.40609

Development of assessment eco-efficiency methods as the main requirement of implementation of «green economy» principles

Gorbunova Olga Ivanovna, Baikal State University, Russia

Kanitskaya Lyudmila Vasilevna, Baikal State University, Russia

Развитие методов оценки эко-эффективности как основное требование реализации принципов «зеленой экономики» - View in Russian

 Download PDF | Downoads: 35

Abstract:
The article provides information on methods and tools developed to date, that allow to evaluate the eco-efficiency of measures to adjust the impact of pro-duction on natural systems and have an active influence on the policies of coun-tries, businesses and companies in order to implement the principles of «green economy». It has been established that in the scientific literature there are no stud-ies of the eco-efficiency of the activities of oil and gas companies in Russia using one of the most commonly used methods data envelopment analysis (DEA). The paper describes the domestic methods that allow to evaluate the relationship be-tween the volume of investment in environmental projects and the economic effi-ciency of the company, as well as its image component. The purpose of this study is to identify the possibilities of domestic methods to influence the environmental policy of Russian oil and gas companies. The results of evaluating the economic efficiency of the implementation of environmental management systems (EMS) on the example of Rosneft PJSC using two different domestic methods that we modified led to the conclusion that the demonstrated close relationship between environmental and economic performance indicators would increase the motivation of company management in the implementation of environmental projects. However, these methods cannot be used for a real assessment of the effectiveness of corrective environmental actions. Our research confirms the need to apply the DEA method to assess and monitor the eco-efficiency of companies in the oil and gas sector of the economy.

Keywords:

“green” economy, cost-effectiveness assessment, data envelopment analysis (DEA), eco-efficiency, environmental management system, image component of the company, oil and gas companies

JEL-Classification: Q35, Q56, Q57, Q59

Citation:
Gorbunova O.I., Kanitskaya L.V. (2019). Development of assessment eco-efficiency methods as the main requirement of implementation of «green economy» principles [Razvitie metodov otsenki eko-effektivnosti kak osnovnoe trebovanie realizatsii printsipov «zelenoy ekonomiki»]. Russian Journal of Innovation Economics, 9(2). (in Russian). – doi: 10.18334/vinec.9.2.40609.


References (transliterated):
(2016). Green Finance: A Bottom-up Approach to Track Existing Flows International Finance. 5.
Arkhipova V. V. (2017). «Zelenye finansy» kak sredstvo dlya resheniya globalnyh problem [\]. The HSE Economic Journal. 17 (2). 312–332. (in Russian).
BP Statistical Review of World Energy 2018Www.bp.com. Retrieved March 24, 2019, from https://www.bp.com/content/dam/bp/en/corporate/pdf/energy-economics/statistical-review/bp-stats-review-2018-full-report.pdf)
Bezhentseva T.V. (2014). Ekspress-otsenka «postoyannogo uluchsheniya» kak elementa sistemy ekologicheskogo menedzhmenta [Rapid assessment of "continuous improvement" as part of the environmental management system]. Omsk Scientific Bulletin. (3). 4–10. (in Russian).
Bogomolova E.Yu., Novikov A.V. (2018). Prognoz i realnost: neftegazovyy kompleks Irkutskoy oblasti [Prediction and reality: the oil and gas industry of the Irkutsk region]. Russian Journal of Entrepreneurship. 19 (10). 2943–2954. (in Russian).
Eder L.V., Filimonova I.V., Nemov V.Yu., Provornaya I.V. (2017). Neftyanaya promyshlennost Sibirskogo Federalnogo okruga na etape smeny para-digmy razvitiya [The oil industry of the Siberian Federal district in the stage of change of development paradigm] Institutional transformation of the economy: space and time. 139-145. (in Russian).
Ekins P., Simon S., Deutsch L., Folke C., De Groot R. (2003). A framework for the practical application of the concepts of critical natural capital and strong sustainability Ecological Economics. (44). 165-185.
Elsayed K., Paton D. (2005). The impact of environmental performance on firm per-formance: static and dynamic panel data evidence Structural Change and Economic Dynamics. 16 (3). 395–412. doi: 10.1016/j.strueco.2004.04.004 .
Gorbunova O. I. (2017). Ekologicheskiy menedzhment v neftegazovyh kompa-niyakh Rossii: reyting ekologicheskoy otvetstvennosti [Environmental management in oil and gas companies of Russia: rating of environmental responsibility]. Bulletin of Baikal State University. (3). 366-371. (in Russian).
Jakob M., Luderer G., Steckel J., Tavoni M., and Monjon S. (2012). Time to act now? Assessing the costs of delaying climate measures and benefits of early action // Climatic Change. 114 (1). 79-99. doi: 10.1007/s10584-011-0128-3 .
Kamenik L.L. (2018). Ekologo-ekonomicheskaya sbalansirovannost — strategiya upravleniya innovatsionnym razvitiem obschestva XXI veka [Ecological-economic balance — the strategy of innovative development of the society of the XXI century]. Russian Journal of Innovation Economics. 8 (1). (in Russian).
Khrustalyov E. Yu., Ratner P. D. (2015). Eko-innovatsii v elektroenergetike: otsenka sravnitelnoy effektivnosti [Eco-innovation in the electric power industry: comparative effectiveness]. Innovatsionnaya ekonomika. 203 (9). 86–92. (in Russian).
Khrustalyov E. Yu., Ratner P. D. (2015). Otsenka ekologicheskoy effektivnosti elektroenergeticheskikh kompaniy Rossii na osnove metodologii analiza sredy funktsionirovaniya [Assessment of environmental efficiency of electric power companies of Russia based on methodology of analysis of the environment of functioning]. Economic analysis: theory and practice. 35 33-42. (in Russian).
Nikitina A. (2012). Shell: strategiya vzaimodeystviya s postavschikami [Shell: strategy of interaction with suppliers]. Neftegazovaya vertikal. (6). 27–40. (in Russian).
Picazo-Tadeo A.J., Beltrán-Esteve M., Gómez-Limón J.A. (2012). Assessing eco-efficiency with directional distance functions European Journal of Operational Research. 220 798–809. doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2012.02.025.
Ratner S. V. (2017). Dinamicheskie zadachi otsenki ekologoekonomicheskoy effektivnosti regionov na osnove bazovyh modeley analiza sredy funktsionirovaniya [The dynamic problem of estimation of ecological and economic efficiency of regions on the basis of the models analysis of the environment of functioning]. Large-Scale Systems Control. (67). 81–106. (in Russian).
Ratner S.V., Ratner M. D. (2016). Neparametricheskaya optimizatsiya v reshenii zadach otsenki effektivnosti sistem regionalnogo ekologicheskogo menedzhmenta [Non-parametric optimization in the solution of problems of estimation of efficiency of regional systems of environmental management]. Digest Finance. (4). 30–40. (in Russian).
Shen J.Y., Qin X.D. (201). What determines Chinese firms’ decision on implementing voluntary environmental schemes? Journal of Service Science and Management. 4 (3). 380–390. doi: 10.4236/jssm.2011.43044 .
Sukhodolov A.Ya. (2014). Realizatsiya vostochnoy gazovoy programmy i perspektivy osvoeniya gazovyh resursov Vostochnoy Sibiri [The implementation of the Eastern gas program and prospects of development of gas resources of Eastern Siberia]. News of the Irkutsk State Economic Academy (Scientific Journal of Baikal State University). (6). 63–71. (in Russian).
Tarakanov M. A. R (2007). Azvitie neftegazovogo kompleksa smezhnyh terri-toriy (Irkutskoy oblasti i respubliki Sakha (Yakutii)) [He development of oil and gas complex adjacent territories (Irkutsk region and the Republic of Sakha (Yakutia))]. News of the Irkutsk State Economic Academy (Scientific Journal of Baikal State University). (6). 55-60. (in Russian).
Turton H., Barreto L. (2006). Long-term security of energy supply and climate change Energy Policy. 34 (15). 2232–2250. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2005.03.016.
Wu J. et al. (2016). Evaluating the environmental efficiency of a two-stage system with undesired outputs by a DEA approach: An interest preference perspective European Journal of Operational Research. 254 (3). 1047–1062. doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2016.04.034 .
Xu T., Gao P., Yu Q., Fang D. (2017). An Improved Eco-Efficiency Analysis Framework Based on Slacks-Based Measure Method Sustainability. 9 1-21. doi: 10.3390/su9060952.
Yin K. et al. (2014). Using eco-efficiency as an indicator for sustainable urban devel-opment: A case study of Chinese provincial capital cities Ecological Indicators. 36 665-671. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.09.003.
Zhang B., Bi J., Yuan Z., Yuan Z.W., Ge J.J. (2018). Eco-efficiency analysis of industrial system in China: A data envelopment analysis approach Ecological economics. 68 (1-2). 306–316. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.03.009 .
Zhang X. (2016). Justice and ecology: from a perspective of political philosophy Terra Economicus. 14 (1). 88–97. doi: 10.18522/2073-6606-14-1-88-97.
Zharkova E.V. (2016). Neftegazodobyvayuschiy kompleks Irkutskoy oblasti: razvitie i problemy [Oil and gas complex of the Irkutsk region: development and problems]. Neftegazovaya geologiya. Teoriya i praktika. 11 (2). (in Russian).