Published in «Russian Journal of Innovation Economics»2 / 2019
DOI: 10.18334/vinec.9.2.40611

Relationship of the formation of modern personal management system and political regimes in russia

Kharitonova Yuliya Vladimirovna, RANEPA (Lipetsk branch), Russia

Взаимосвязь становления современной системы управления персоналом и политических режимов в России - View in Russian

 Download PDF | Downoads: 10

Highlights:
The article discusses the features of the influence of the political regime on the formation and development of the personnel management system in all areas of the country's economy. In the conditions of dynamic changes, there is a clear problem of finding new mechanisms for managing personnel that will meet the challenges of a democratic society. In this context, personnel technologies that are used as a method of enhancing the driving force of Russian production  human resources  are also of particular importance. The key quality of modern democracy in the personnel management system in the conditions of the functioning of the current political regime of the Russian Federation is the possibility of development, accumulation of intellectual capital, as well as full participation of staff in the management of the organization.

Abstract:
The article is devoted to the study of the specific effects on the personnel management system of the existing political regimes historically in the territory of the Russian Federation. The author has conducted an analytical review of the developments of competent specialists in various fields of activity with regard to the separate features of the political regime; the key difference between this definition and the concept of the political system has been determined. In this context, the author hypothesized that the effectiveness of the success of each enterprise’s activity in any field of business depends on its employees, and the political regime in effect in the country of operation of the enterprise determines certain aspects of the process of building a personnel management system. Through the method of analyzing competent literary sources, synthesizing and comparing theoretical materials, the author highlighted fundamental concepts in an integrated system of personnel management of the country in the framework of the functioning of a certain political regime. As a result of the work, trends in the influence of the current political regime in Russia on modern personnel management systems are indicated, which is of practical significance for the system of personnel management of domestic enterprises.

Keywords:

management, personnel, political regime, society, state, system

JEL-Classification: O10, O15, R00

Citation:
Kharitonova Yu.V. (2019). Relationship of the formation of modern personal management system and political regimes in russia [Vzaimosvyazy stanovleniya sovremennoy sistemy upravleniya personalom i politicheskikh rezhimov v Rossii]. Russian Journal of Innovation Economics, 9(2). (in Russian). – doi: 10.18334/vinec.9.2.40611.


References (transliterated):
Banerjee A., Berry J., Duflo E., Harini K. (2017). From Proof of Concept to Scalable Policies: Challenges and Solutions, with an Application The Journal of Economic Perspectives. 31 (4). 73-102.
Farafontov A.A. (2011). Sovremennyy politicheskiy rezhim Rossii v zerkale avtoritarizma [Contemporary political regime of Russia in the mirror of authoritarianism]. Almanac of modern science and education. (8). 62-66. (in Russian).
Fedorchenko S.N. (2010). Razvitie politicheskogo rezhima tandemokratii v Rossii [Development of the tandemocracy political regime in Russia]. Problem Analysis and Public Administration Projection. 3 (1). 114-126. (in Russian).
Gerasimova E.V., Chernyaeva T.I. (2012). Formy i rezhimy vzaimodeystviya vlasti i obschestva v usloviyakh politicheskoy modernizatsii Rossii [Forms and Regimes of Interaction between Power and Society in Conditions of Political Modernization of Russia]. Bulletin of the volga region Institute of Administration. (1). 44-49. (in Russian).
Goreva N.A. (2010). Ideologicheskiy diskurs kak mekhanizm legitimatsii politicheskogo rezhima v sovremennoy Rossii [Ideological discourse as the legitimating mechanism of political regime in the modern russia]. Vestnik Voronezhskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Lingvistika i mezhkulturnaya kommunikatsiya. (1). 180-182. (in Russian).
Heylen F. (1996). Unemployment in Europe: A problem of relative or aggregate International labour review. 135 (1). 17-36.
Khazov A.M. (2012). Kharakteristika politicheskikh rezhimov v postsovetskoy Rossii [Characteristics of political regimes in post-Soviet Russia]. Power. (2). 109-112. (in Russian).
Marin-Ostrovskiy A.N. (2010). Politicheskiy rezhim, institut sobstvennosti i ekonomika znaniy v sovremennoy Rossii [Political regime, institute of property and knowledge economy in modern Russia]. Vestnik RGGU. Seriya: Politologiya. Istoriya. Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. Zarubezhnoe regionovedenie. Vostokovedenie. (1). 86-98. (in Russian).
Nasi G. (2011). Public Personnel Policies: Impact on Government Performance Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice. 13 5-10.
Rudenko V.N. (2013). Demokraticheskoe verkhovenstvo prava i politicheskie rezhimy (Rossiya i postsovetskie strany) [Democratic rule of law and political regimes (Russia and post-soviet countries)]. Nauchnyy ezhegodnik Instituta filosofii i prava Uralskogo otdeleniya Rossiyskoy akademii nauk. 13 (4). 57-73. (in Russian).
Shmeleva O.Yu. (2012). Mesto i rol politiko-kulturnogo faktora v opredelenii spetsifiki politicheskogo rezhima sovremennoy Rossii [The place and role of political - culture factors in determining the specificalty of the political regime of modern russia]. European Social Science Journal. (1). 474-481. (in Russian).
Winkler-Buttner H. (2017). Differing degrees of labour market regulation in Europe Ibid. 32 (3). 170 – 173.