Published in «Journal of International Economic Affairs»2 / 2019
DOI: 10.18334/eo.9.2.40777

Factors affecting community participation in heritage resources management in Syria

Mohammad Mohannad Ali, Far Eastern Federal University, School of Economics and Management, Russia

Factors affecting community participation in heritage resources management in Syria - View in Russian

 Download PDF | Downoads: 29

Despite the increasing attention of the government, the management of heritage resources in Syria remains ineffective in terms of maintaining the resources themselves as well as enhancing the economic and social development of local communities who are not effectively participating in the management of these resources and are even excluded from this whole process in many cases. This paper explores the factors affecting this level of participation by reviewing the already written literature about two cases where a community approach has been applied. It has shown that attachment to resources, trust between actors, support from NGOs and facilitative support of government would enhance cooperative behavior in the resource.


community participation, heritage, institutions

JEL-Classification: Z10, Z11, Z18, Z19

Mohammad Mohannad Ali (2019). Factors affecting community participation in heritage resources management in Syria [Factors affecting community participation in heritage resources management in Syria]. Journal of International Economic Affairs, 9(2). (in Russian). – doi: 10.18334/eo.9.2.40777.

References (transliterated):
Acheson J.M. (2006). Institutional failure in resource management Annual Review of Anthropology. (35). 117-134.
Agrawal A., Ostrom E. (2001). Collective action, property rights, and decentralization in resource use in India and Nepal Politics and Society. (29(4)). 485-514.
Bandaragoda D.J. (2000). A framework for institutional analysis for water resources management in a river basin context Iwmi. (5).
Boisseaux S., Knoepfel P., Laesslé M., Tippenhauer L. (2012). Labellisation du patrimoine une approche néo-institutionnaliste
Briassoulis H. (2002). Sustainable tourism and the question of the commons Annals of tourism research. (29(4)). 1065-1085.
Buccellati G. In the Eye of the StormUrkesh Folio 2012-13. Retrieved from
Dar Mar Elian Archaeological Project heritage Archaeology. Retrieved from 78db09d6078b_0#photos
Gillot L. (2010). Towards a socio-political history of archaeology in the Middle East: The development of archaeological practice and its impacts on local communities in Syria Bulletin of the History of Archaeology. (20(1)). 4–16. doi: 10.5334/bha.20102.
Gould P.G. (2017). Considerations on governing heritage as a commons resource
Infringements in the villages of Jabal al_Zawia in Idlib GovernorateDGAM (a). Retrieved from
Jamieson A. (2016). Community Engagement and Near Eastern Archaeological Collections: The Syrian-Australian Archaeological Research Collaboration Project Altorientalische Forschungen. (43(1-2)). 196-202.
Loosley E. (2005). Archaeology and cultural belonging in contemporary Syria: the value of archaeology to religious minorities World Archaeology. (37(4)). 589-596.
North D. (0). Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance
Ostrom E. (1990). Governing the commons
Ostrom E.E., Dietz T.E., Dolšak N.E., Stern P.C., Stonich S.E., Weber E.U. (2002). The drama of the commons
The Discovery of Mosaic in the village of Brahlia in Wadi BaradaDGAM (b). Retrieved from
Urbano D., Toledano N., Ribeiro D. (2010). Support policy for the tourism business: a comparative case study in Spain Service Industries Journal. (30(1)). 119-131.