Published in «Russian Journal of Innovation Economics»3 / 2019
DOI: 10.18334/vinec.9.3.40822

The economic complexity at the sub-national level as an innovative paradigm for regional development

Voloshenko Kseniya Yurevna, Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University, Russia

Drok Tatiana Emelyanovna, Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University, Russia

Farafonov Yuliya Yurevna, Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University, Russia

Экономическая сложность на субнациональном уровне - инновационная парадигма регионального развития - View in Russian

 Download PDF | Downoads: 31

Abstract:
The article deals with theoretical and practical issues of measurement and application of economic complexity at the subnational level. A review of the most notable studies in this area, taking into account the methodological features of the approach at the regional level, is given. The strengths and weaknesses of the theory of economic complexity are considered. Particular attention is paid to the most important and complex methodological issues related to the tools for measuring economic complexity, as well as the use of this campaign at the subnational level, taking into account the complexity of the formation of the database system and its processing. The features of the approach to the Russian regions are revealed, the grouping of industries and sectors is proposed to justify the development strategies, mechanisms and tools of their sectoral policy.

Keywords:

commodity exchange operations, economic complexity, economic policy, subnational level, value creation

JEL-Classification: F02, F10, F60

Citation:
Voloshenko K.Yu., Drok T.E., Farafonova Yu.Yu. (2019). The economic complexity at the sub-national level as an innovative paradigm for regional development [Ekonomicheskaya slozhnosty na subnatsionalnom urovne - innovatsionnaya paradigma regionalnogo razvitiya]. Russian Journal of Innovation Economics, 9(3). (in Russian). – doi: 10.18334/vinec.9.3.40822.


References (transliterated):
. Dıaz-Lanchas J., Llano C., Minondo, A., & Requena F. Cities Trade Pattern. Retrieved June 06, 2019, from https://old.reunionesdeestudiosregionales.org/Reus2015/htdocs/pdf/p1509.pdf
. Farra F., Klos N., Schober U., Sigalova O., & Zhukov A. Improving regional performance in Russia: a capability-based approach. European Bank for Reconstruction and Development. Retrieved June 13, 2019, from https://www.ebrd.com/downloads/research/economics/workingpapers/wp0155.pdf
Azam S. (2017). A cross-country empirical test of cognitive abilities and innovation nexus International Journal of Educational Development. (53). 128 - 136.
Balsalobre S. J. P., Verduras C. L., & Lanchas J. D. Measuring the Economic Complexity at the sub-national level using international and interregional trade. Retrieved June 13, 2019, from http://www.etsg.org/ETSG2017/papers/perez_llano_complexity_2017.pdf
Bam W., & De Bruyne K. (2018). Improving Industrial Policy Intervention: The Case of Steel in South Africa The Journal of Development Studies. 1-16.
Chávez J. C., Mosqueda M. T., & Gómez-Zaldívar M. (2017). Economic complexity and regional growth performance: Evidence from the Mexican economy The Review of Regional Studies. (47). 201-219.
Feenstra R. C., Lipsey R. E., Deng H., Ma A. C., & Mo H. World trade flows: 1962-2000. Working Paper No. 11040. National Bureau of Economic Research. Retrieved June 06, 2019, from https://www.nber.org/papers/w11040.pdf
Felipe J., Kumar U., Abdon A., & Bacate M. (2012). Product complexity and economic development Structural Change and Economic Dynamics. (23). 36 - 68.
Freitas E. E., & Paiva E. A. (2015). Diversificação e sofisticação das exportações: uma aplicação do product space aos dados do Brasil Fortaleza. (46). 79-98.
Gaulier G., & Zignago S. Baci: international trade database at the product-level (the 19942007 version). Working Paper No. 201023, CEPII. Retrieved June 06, 2019, from http://www.cepii.fr/PDF_PUB/wp/2010/wp2010-23.pdf
Hartmann D., Guevara M. R., Jara-Figueroa C., Aristarán M., & Hidalgo C. A. (2017). Linking economic complexity, institutions, and income inequality World Development. (93). 75-93.
Hausmann R., & Hidalgo C. A. Country diversification, product ubiquity, and economic divergence. FR Working Paper Series 10-045, Harvard Kennedy School. Retrieved June 13, 2019, from https://growthlab.cid.harvard.edu/files/growthlab/files/201.pdf
Ivanova I., Strand O., Kushnir D., & Leydesdorff L. (2017). Economic and technological complexity: A model study of indicators of knowledge-based innovation systems Technological Forecasting and Social Change. (120). 77-89.
Kadochnikov S. M., & Fedyunina A. A. (2013). Economic growth due to export externalities: a spatial econometric analysis for Russian regions, 20032008 International Journal of Economic Policy in Emerging Economies. (6). 358-374.
Kravchenko N.A., Ageeva S.D. (2017). Diversifikatsiya ekonomiki: institutsionalnye aspekty [Diversification of the economy: institutional aspects]. Journal of Institution Studies. (4). 52-67. (in Russian).
Lyubimov I.L., Gvozdeva M.A., Kazakova M.V., Nesterova K.V. (2017). Slozhnost ekonomiki i vozmozhnost diversifikatsii eksporta v rossiyskikh regionakh [The complexity of the economy and diversification of exports in the Russian regions]. The Journal of the New Economic Association. (2). 94-122. (in Russian).
Lyubimov I.L., Lysyuk M.V., Gvozdeva M.A. (2018). Atlas ekonomicheskoy slozhnosti rossiyskikh regionov [Atlas of economic complexity, Russian regional pages]. Voprosy Ekonomiki. (6). 71 - 91. (in Russian).
Maggioni D., Turco A. L., & Gallegati M. (2016). Does product complexity matter for firms' output volatility Journal of Development Economics. (121). 94-109.
Mariani M. S., Vidmer A., Medo M., & Zhang Y. C. (2015). Measuring economic complexity of countries and products: which metric to use The European Physical Journal B. (88). 293.
Nepelski D., & De Prato G. (2015). Corporate control, location and complexity of ICT R&D: A network analysis at the city level Urban Studies. (52). 721-737.
Ourens G. Can the Method of Reflections help predict future growth? Documento de Trabajo/FCS-DE; 17/12. Retrieved June 06, 2019, from https://sites.uclouvain.be/econ/DP/IRES/2013008.pdf
Poncet S., & de Waldemar F. S. (2013). Export upgrading and growth: the prerequisite of domestic embeddedness World Development. (51). 104-118.
Reynolds C., Agrawal M., Lee I., Zhan C., Li J., Taylor P., Mares T., Morison J., Angelakis N., & Roos G. (2018). A sub-national economic complexity analysis of Australia’s states and territories Regional Studies. (52). 715 - 726.
Roos G., Shroff Z., Gamble, H., Taylor P., Mares T., Esvelt-Allen R., & Baird A. Smart Specialisation - Insights for a Future Industry Policy. Economic Development Board of South Australia – Main Report. Government of South Australia. Adelaide, South Australia. Australia. Retrieved June 13, 2019, from http://economicdevelopmentboardsa.com.au/wp-content/uploads/Smart-Specialisation-report-HR.pdf
Salles F. C., Rocha E. M. P. da Porto I. V. de B., & Vasconcelos, F. L. V. (2017). A armadilha da baixa complexidade em Minas Gerais: o desafio da sofisticação econômica em um estado exportador de commodities Revista Brasileira De Inovação. (17). 33 - 62.
Sweet C., & Eterovic D. (2019). Do patent rights matter? 40 years of innovation, complexity and productivity World Development. (115). 78-93.
Tacchella A., Cristelli M., Caldarelli G., Gabrielli A., & Pietronero L. (2013). Economic complexity: conceptual grounding of a new metrics for global competitiveness Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control. (37). 1683-1691.
Yaméogo N. D., Nabassaga T., & Ncube M. (2014). Diversification and sophistication of livestock products: The case of African countries Food Policy. (49). 398 - 407.
Yue J., & Zhou S. (2018). Democracy’s comparative advantage: Evidence from aggregated trade data, 1962–2010 World Development. (111). 27-40.