Published in «Creative Economy»9 / 2019
DOI: 10.18334/ce.13.9.40947

Stimulation of intellectual activity of Russian companies

Gorodnova Natalya Vasilevna, Ural Federal University named after the first President of Russia B.N.Yeltsin, Russia

Samarskaya Nadezhda Aleksandrovna, Federal State Budgetary Institution “All-Russian Scientific Research Institute of Labor” of the Ministry of Labour and Social Protection of the Russian Federation, Russia

Стимулирование интеллектуальной деятельности российских компаний - View in Russian

 Download PDF | Downoads: 75

Increasing the digital potential of Russian companies implementing new national projects, forming an information structure and digital technology platforms, training highly qualified personnel for technological breakthrough and creation of a digital economy, as well as stimulating the personnel of Russian companies to innovate are the primary and priority tasks of the Russian state. Today, our state pays special attention to the use of IT-technologies and intellectual property objects (IPOs) in the activities of companies. The process of qualitative development of a single company, region and economy of the country as a whole is directly related to the continuous improvement of technical means, tools and technologies. Involvement in active turnover of intangible results, setting them on accounting and further commercialization of human labor are an integral part of economic relations in any country, including the Russian Federation. In connection with the above, the topic of this research is recognized as very relevant and topical.
The purpose of the research is defined as follows: on the basis of systematization of the accumulated experience to develop a methodological approach and algorithm to stimulate the intellectual and creative activity of the staff of large companies in modern Russian conditions. In the course of the work the authors systematized the legal regulation of intellectual property in Russia, investigated the concept of intellectual property and the result of intellectual activity in modern economic conditions, as well as the experience of implementing innovative projects within the concept of “Smart City“. In addition, based on the results of previous studies, a mechanism for stimulating intellectual activity of personnel of large Russian companies, as well as a methodology and algorithm for determining the amount of incentive payments to staff for early implementation of Smart projects were developed.
The methodological basis for writing the work are general scientific methods of cognition, in particular, methods of economic analysis of private law, the method of logical analysis, the system method, the comparative legal method, the method of expert assessments, synthesis. The information base of the study is the federal legislation and regulations in the field of intellectual property regulation, as well as the current practice of turnover of intellectual property in Russia and abroad.
It is concluded that the motivation system has a maximum impact on the achievement of strategic goals of economic entities involved in the implementation of intellectual activity associated with the transition to an innovative path of development in the framework of new national projects. These proposals are of practical importance and can be applied in innovative activities in Russian joint-stock companies and scientific organizations.
The results obtained by the authors of the study can be useful for representatives of public authorities and scientific and professional communities, specialists of large companies and analytical centers, for which the increase of innovative and intellectual activity of the personnel of enterprises is of professional interest.


commercialization, incentive payments, information technologies, innovation activity, intellectual property (IP), results of intellectual activity (RIA), smart city

JEL-Classification: J24, O31, O32, O33

Gorodnova N.V., Samarskaya N.A. (2019). Stimulation of intellectual activity of Russian companies [Stimulirovanie intellektualnoy deyatelnosti rossiyskikh kompaniy]. Creative Economy, 13(9). (in Russian). – doi: 10.18334/ce.13.9.40947.

References (transliterated):
Alafishvili A. (2017). Effektivnost investitsiy v obekty intellektualnoy sobstvennosti [The efficiency of investments in intellectual property]. Intellektualnaya sobstvennost. Promyshlennaya sobstvennost. (10). 67-72. (in Russian).
Barwa Sh., Rai Sh. M. (2003). Knowledge and /as power: a feminist critique of trade related intellectual property rights Gender, Technology and Development. 7 (1). 91-113. doi: 10.1177/097185240300700105.
Berezhnov G.V. (2005). Kreativnaya deyatelnost predpriyatiya [Creative activity of the enterprise] M.: Izdatelskiy dom «Melap». (in Russian).
Chan V.A. (2017). The issuance and role of intellectual property in the economy of the USA Alleya nauki. 1 (9). 30-32.
Chekhonina A.A. (2017). Rezultaty tvorcheskoy deyatelnosti kak obekt intellektualnoy sobstvennosti [The results of creative activities as intellectual property]. Alley of Science. 4 (1). 17-20. (in Russian).
Darmilova Zh.D. (2018). Kachestvo upravleniya obektami intellektualnoy sobstvennosti kompanii (metodologicheskie aspekty) [The quality of management of the intellectual property of the company (methodological aspects)]. Economics: theory and practice. (1(49)). 3-9. (in Russian).
Dovzhenko P.V., Kirbitova S.V., Kozhina N.A., Ostanin V.A. (2018). Strana proiskhozhdeniya tovara, soderzhaschego obekty intellektualnoy sobstvennosti: problemy metoda opredeleniya [Country of origin of goods containing intellectual property objectives: problems of the definition method]. Fundamental research. (6). 104-108. (in Russian).
Fedkina Yu.V. (2018). Obekty intellektualnoy sobstvennosti pri vyvode brenda na rynok [Intellectual property upon withdrawal of the brand on the market]. Reklama: teoriya i praktika. (3). 218-226. (in Russian).
Gareev I.F., Mukhametova N.N. (2018). Vnedrenie tsifrovyh tekhnologiy na etapakh zhiznennogo tsikla obektov zhiloy nedvizhimosti [The introduction of digital technologies at the stages of the life cycle of residential real estate]. Russian Journal of Housing Research. 5 (3). 305-322. (in Russian). doi: 10.18334/zhs.5.3.39692.
Gorodnova N.V., Krupkin A.V. (2018). Issues of a contemporary person in a digitalized economy Social Sciences and Arts. 507-514. doi: 10.5593/sgemsocial2018/1.5/S05.109.
Gorodnova N.V., Peshkova A.A. (2016). Razvitie instituta gosudarstvenno-chastnogo partnerstva: motivatsiya personala k innovatsionnoy deyatelnosti [The development of the institute of public-private partnerships: personnel motivation to innovative activity]. International Research Journal. (4-1(46)). 20-23. (in Russian). doi: 10.18454/IRJ.2016.46.277.
Grigorev Yu.V. (2008). Upravlenie izobretatelskoy deyatelnostyu: intellektualnye prava [Management of inventive activity: intellectual property rights]. Quality. innovation. education. (3(34)). 34-40. (in Russian).
Ilyin A.B. (2010). Problemy kommertsializatsii intellektualnogo produkta [Problems of commercialization of intellectual products] Intangible resources of regions (the information aspect). 49-52. (in Russian).
Ilyin A.B., Shpilev D.A. (2011). Ispolzovanie intellektualnogo produkta vysshego obrazovaniya dlya povysheniya ustoychivosti razvitiya territorii [Use of intellectual product of higher education for stability improving of territory development]. Vestnik Yaroslavskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta im. P.G. Demidova. Seriya Gumanitarnye nauki. (4(18)). 173-175. (in Russian).
Kurkova A.S. (2017). Zaschita tamozhennymi organami prav na obekty intellektualnoy sobstvennosti [Protection of the rights to intellectual property objects by the customs bodies]. Yuridicheskiy fakt. (19). 55-58. (in Russian).
Mahon B. (2000). The intellectual property industries and the new tech world Business Information Review. 17 (4). 185-190. doi: 10.1177/0266382004237746.
Matsika K. (2007). Intellectual property, libraries and access to information in Zimbabwe IFUL Journal. 33 (2). 160-167. doi: 10.1177/0340035207080556.
Murygina L.S. (2007). Potentsial malyh innovatsionnyh predpriyatiy v rossiyskoy ekonomike [The potential of small innovative enterprises in the Russian economy]. Bulletin of the South Ural State University. Series: economics and management. (5(77)). 76-80. (in Russian).
Nesterenko Yu.N. (2011). Konkurentosposobnost malyh innovatsionnyh predpriyatiy i puti ee povysheniya [The competitiveness of small innovative enterprises and ways to growth]. Bulletin of Russian State University for the Humanities. (10). 30-36. (in Russian).
Pavlova S.V. (2017). Vvedenie v khozyaystvennyy oborot kompaniy obektov intellektualnoy sobstvennosti [Introduction to the economic turnover of intellectual property companies]. Science Magazine. (1). 28-33. (in Russian). doi: 10.17586/2310-1172-2017-10-1-28-33 .
Primenko Yu.V. (2017). K voprosu o pravovom rezhime sekreta proizvodstva (nou-khau) kak obekta intellektualnoy sobstvennosti [The question of the legal regime of trade secrets (know-how) as an object of intellectual property]. Problemy prava. (1(60)). 60-63. (in Russian).
Rolinson P., Arievich E.A., Ermilova D.E. (2018). Obekty intellektualnoy sobstvennosti, sozdavaemye s pomoschyu iskusstvennogo intellekta: osobennosti pravovogo rezhima Rossii i za rubezhom [Intellectual property created using artificial intelligence: peculiarities of legal regulation of Russia and abroad]. Law (zakon). (5). 63-71. (in Russian).
Rubashka V.P. (2018). Marketing obekta intellektualnoy sobstvennosti [Marketing of intellectual property]. Uralskiy nauchnyy vestnik. (3(168)). 010-016. (in Russian).
Sadykov R.A. (2017). Prioritety obespecheniya prav na obekty intellektualnoy sobstvennosti [Priorities for ensuring rights to intellectual property objects]. Economy. Business. Banks. (58). 105-109. (in Russian).
Satalkina N.I., Dvoretskiy S.I., Krasnyanskiy M.N. i dr. (2012). Kommertsializatsiya rezultatov intellektualnoy deyatelnosti nauchnyh i obrazovatelnyh uchrezhdeniy: sostoyanie i perspektivy [Commercialization of results of intellectual activity of scientific and educational institutions: condition and prospects] Tambov: Izd-vo FGBOU VPO «TGTU». (in Russian).
Seliverstov Yu. I. (2013). The analysis of intellectual property use in the economic turnover of Russian enterprises World Applied Sciences Journal. 25 (12). 1763-1769. doi: 10.5829/idosi.wasj.2013.25.12.7084.
Shulgin V.D., Shulgin D.B., Uzhneva D.A., Apanasenko A.V. (2018). Patentnaya strategiya i obschekorporativnye tseli: mekhanizmy vzaimnogo vliyaniya [Fitting patent strategy to corporate goals: mutual impact analysis]. Innovatsii v zhizn. (4(27)). 61-72. (in Russian).
Sidorchuk R. Problems of marketing in small innovative enterprisesAnnals of marketing-MBA, Department of Marketing, Marketing MBA. Retrieved August 11, 2019, from
Sineva N.L., Yashkova E.V. (2015). Upravlenie razvitiem intellektualno-kreativnoy deyatelnosti personala sovremennoy organizatsii [Management of the development of intellectual and creative activity of modern organization person]. Naukovedenie. 7 (5(30)). 90. (in Russian). doi: 10.15862/210EVN515.
Stepanova G.N., Beskorovaynaya S.A., Kublashvili O.V. (2018). Razvitie kontseptualnogo myshleniya mediaspetsialista kak intellektualnoy tekhnologii prinyatiya upravlencheskikh resheniy v mediabiznese [Development of conceptual thinking of the media expert as intellectual technology adoptions of management decisions in media industry]. Izvestiya vysshikh uchebnyh zavedeniy. Problemy poligrafii i izdatelskogo dela. (4). 33-39. (in Russian).
Vladykin A.A. (2013). Kommertsializatsiya nauchnyh razrabotok kak rezultat innovatsionnoy deyatelnosti i sposob dopolnitelnogo finansirovaniya vysshikh uchebnyh zavedeniy [Research and development commercialization as a result of the innovative activities and additional financing resource in the higher educational institution]. Theory and practice of social development. (4). 219-223. (in Russian).