Published in «Journal of International Economic Affairs»3 / 2019
DOI: 10.18334/eo.9.3.41063

The introduction of new technologies and total factor productivity: microeconometric analysis

Ponomarev Yuriy Yurevich, RANEPA, Russia

Magomedov Rustam Nabiyulakhovich, RANEPA, Russia

Внедрение новых технологий и совокупная факторная производительность: микроэконометрический анализ - View in Russian

 Download PDF | Downoads: 21

Abstract:
Technological development is one of the main factors in the growth of total factor productivity in the economy and, as a consequence, of sustainable economic growth. In order to achieve the national objectives defined by the Decree of Russian President № 204, the implementation of which envisages a significant increase in productivity in the economy and accelerated technological development, it is important to understand how the introduction of new technologies influence on the transforming industries and increase of their productivity. The article proposes an approach to quantify the effects of the introduction of a key new industry technology to change the production function of companies in the industry in terms of changing their functional form and, as a consequence, the change in total factor productivity (TFP) in the industry. The proposed approach is tested on the example of the transition of the cement industry in Russia to the dry method of production. The results show that the introduction of new technology in the cement industry has led to a significant increase in TFP (an average of 47%), in particular, due to the changes in the intensity of the use of production factors, which, however, was not accompanied by a significant change in the functional type of industrial production functions.

Keywords:

cement industry, production functions, technological development, total factor productivity

JEL-Classification: D24, L23, M11, O33

Citation:
Ponomarev Yu.Yu., Magomedov R.N. (2019). The introduction of new technologies and total factor productivity: microeconometric analysis [Vnedrenie novyh tekhnologiy i sovokupnaya faktornaya proizvoditelnosty: mikroekonometricheskiy analiz]. Journal of International Economic Affairs, 9(3). (in Russian). – doi: 10.18334/eo.9.3.41063.


References (transliterated):
Ackerberg D. (2007). Econometric tools for analyzing market outcomes In: Handbook of econometrics. 4171-4276.
Aguirregabiria V. (2012). Empirical industrial organization: models, methods, and applications Book in Progress. 25-43.
Collard-Wexler, Allan, and Jan De Loecker (2015). Reallocation and technology: Evidence from the US steel industry American Economic Review. 131-171.
Gringard, Semyuel (2016). Internet veschey: buduschee uzhe zdes [Internet of things: the future is already here] (in Russian).
HANS MICHAEL KRAUSE Turning ideas into reality the journey of one leading manufacturer into the industrial IOTManufacture. Retrieved from http://manufuture2017.eu/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/pdf-Hans-Michael-Krause.pdf
HP Inc. SMARC A playground for engineering and analyticsEconomic Development Board. Retrieved from https://www.edb.gov.sg/en/news-and-resources/insights/innovation/hp-inc-smarc-a-playground-for-engineering-and-analytics.html
Hall B. (1987). The relationship between firm size and firm growth in the US manufacturing Journal of Industrial Economics. 583-606.
Hoch I. (1962). Estimation of production parameters combining time-series and cross-section data Econometrica. (1). 34-53.
Idrisov G. I. (2016). Promyshlennaya politika Rossii v sovremennyh usloviyakh [Industrial policy of Russia in modern conditions] (in Russian).
Knyaginin V. N. (2017). Novaya tekhnologicheskaya revolyutsiya: vyzovy i vozmozhnosti dlya Rossii [New technological revolution: challenges and opportunities for Russia]. Tsentr strategicheskikh razrabotok. (in Russian).
Levinsohn J., Petrin A. (2003). Estimating production functions using inputs to control for unobservables The Review of Economic Studies. (2). 317-341.
Litvinova Yu.O., Ponomarev Yu.Yu. (2016). Analiz vliyaniya razvitiya transportnoy infrastruktury na sovokupnuyu faktornuyu proizvoditelnost [Analysis of the impact of transport infrastructure development on total factor productivity]. Russian Journal of Entrepreneurship. (1). 89-98. (in Russian).
Marschak J., Andrews W. H. (1944). Random simultaneous equations and the theory of production Econometrica, Journal of the Econometric Society. 143-205.
Nakamura, Tsuyoshi, and Hiroshi Ohashi (2008). Effects of technology adoption on productivity and industry growth: A study of steel refining furnaces The Journal of Industrial Economics. 470-499.
Olley G. S., Pakes A. (1996). The dynamics of productivity in the telecommunications equipment industry Econometrica. (6). 1263-1297.
Romer, Paul M. (1990). Endogenous technological change Journal of political Economy.
Solow, Robert M. (1957). Technical change and the aggregate production function The review of Economics and Statistics. 312-320.
Van Biesebroeck, Johannes (2003). Productivity Dynamics with Technology Choice: An Application to Automobile Assembly The Review of Economic Studies. 167-198.
ITS 6-2015 Proizvodstvo tsementaElektronnyy fond pravovoy i normativno-tekhnicheskoy dokumentatsii. (in Russian). Retrieved from http://docs.cntd.ru/document/1200128666
Itogi 2017 goda. Proizvodstvo tsementa v Rossiyskoy FederatsiiBeton.ru. (in Russian). Retrieved from https://beton.ru/news/detail.php?ID=429035
Promyshlennosty RossiiRosstat. Retrieved from http://www.gks.ru/wps/wcm/connect/rosstat_main/rosstat/ru/statistics/publications/catalog/doc_1139918730234
Rekruter s zheleznoy khvatkoy: kak roboty ischut i nanimayut lyudey. (in Russian). Retrieved November 02, 2018, from https://www.rbc.ru/own_business/19/06/2017/59439a489a7947949e6db9fb
StroitelstvoRosstat. Retrieved from http://www.gks.ru/wps/wcm/connect/rosstat_main/rosstat/ru/statistics/enterprise/building/#
Tsementnye zavodyBeton.ru. Retrieved from https://beton.ru/cemzavodi/?ftype=1